Courtesy of Joy on Fire<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nNick:<\/strong> You\u2019ve also released a few music videos in recent years. Have these been your first forays into making music videos, and what has that process been like?<\/span><\/p>\nAnna:<\/strong> \u201cNight Sticks\u201d must have been the first one we did, and then \u201cPunk Jazz\u201d was the second one, so there was a big gap in between those first couple videos. When we started working with Dan, his brother and sister-in-law<\/span>\u2014Mark Isaac and Gabriela Bulisova\u2014<\/span>are video and multimedia artists, so he asked if they would make something for us. They\u2019ve graciously made two videos now and are starting a third, so we\u2019re really grateful to them. The first video they did for us was for \u201cUh Huh,\u201d and they made a really powerful video. <\/span><\/p>\nAfter that, Chris, our drummer, knew a director and filmmaker through his job, Damien Davis, and he made the video for \u201cThunderdome.\u201d That was filmed here in the apartment. That was a super-fun process, it was very different. We\u2019re not in the one for \u201cUh Huh,\u201d it\u2019s all kind of found footage and animation, and the \u201cThunderdome\u201d one is more traditional. Once we had those we were like, \u201cWe want to make videos for a lot more things.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nJohn:<\/strong> We filmed one four days ago in the room we\u2019re sitting in. We turned it into a cheap movie set. We cleared all the furniture out, and we got the cat involved in the video! We actually got her to be in the whole video, with a little editing magic, too. I grew up on MTV, back when they had music videos, I\u2019m not even sure what MTV does anymore! But when I was watching they had good shows like <\/span>120 Minutes<\/span><\/i> which had some interesting bands on smaller labels. So I grew up on it, so to come back to videos and with YouTube being the format, the nice thing is that you can do things with no money sometimes, too. The video we just did is probably going to cost basically zero. We had to pay the cat in food!<\/span><\/p>\nAnna:<\/strong> John wanted the cat to be in every scene, without really thinking about what that would be like! And then the funny thing is that she was sitting on the amp while we were setting up, and that\u2019s what he wanted it to do for the video. So of course before we\u2019re ready, she\u2019s sitting on it, 10 minutes without moving. We get started and she jumps down immediately.<\/span><\/p>\nJohn:<\/strong> No noise was being made, the amp\u2019s not on, we\u2019re playing to the pre-recorded track, she just sensed it! The pay scale was too low! [laughs]<\/span><\/p>\nAnna:<\/strong> I think it turned out OK. I just started learning how to edit videos last year because I made a simple video for \u201cHymn\u201d<\/span> for fun since that seemed like everyone was doing, since there were no live shows. We\u2019re working with a couple of other people to make things, but we\u2019re trying to DIY it.<\/span><\/p>\nJohn:<\/strong> Counting ourselves, we\u2019re working with four different video artists, which is cool because we get different takes on it. Some are hands-off, like \u201cUh Huh.\u201d Our singer, Dan<\/span>\u2014<\/span>it was his brother and sister-in-law<\/span>\u2014so he talked to them about certain ideas, but we didn\u2019t give any ideas, we just said go with it. I had a one-page script for the video for \u201cThunderdome,\u201d and then the director Damien Davis and I worked on it and changed some things up, and Anna also made some changes before I even scripted it because the original idea took place outside and it was cold [laughs]!<\/span><\/p>\nBut yeah, having different people do videos is really cool because you get different textures, different styles, and different ideas. When we do it ourselves, we have to rethink the space we live in: How can we turn this into a movie set? How can get away with one angle being the majority of the video? I think that the video Anna did for \u201cHymn\u201d was the perfect video for that song\u2014that\u2019s the feeling of that song. I find that a less menacing piece. There\u2019s a lot of nature in the video. My favorite videos\u2014this is not very profound\u2014bring out the music\u2014the overall feeling, the structure, or both. For the videos that we\u2019re doing ourselves, that\u2019s where the initial ideas are coming from. Let\u2019s bring out the music.<\/span><\/p>\nNick:<\/strong> You have a lot of \u201csequel songs,\u201d where sometimes across multiple albums there will be \u201cParts 1 and 2,\u201d or the title will be similar, like in \u201cIf 3 was 8\u201d and \u201cIf .3 was 8 Billion.\u201d What is some of the thought behind some of these sequel songs and behind some of the naming decisions that you make around them?<\/span><\/p>\nJohn:<\/strong> I\u2019m glad you mention \u201cIf .3 was 8 Billion,\u201d because that was just a lot of fun. The second part of that was an in-studio process. The song I\u2019m going to talk about is \u201cThe Complete Book of the Bonsai,” Parts 1 and 2. I used the same bass chord to get both pieces going, and I felt that there was enough personality in that bass chord that even though the songs go in different directions, there\u2019s the feeling of how each one begins\u2014there\u2019s enough similarity that they seem to be of a sequence. Structurally, they both have three big parts, so there\u2019s a structural similarity, so just to me, it made sense to use the name to point out the similarity.<\/span><\/p>\nAnna:<\/strong> There\u2019s also something funny about \u201cThe Complete Book…Part 2,\u201d that\u2019s just a dumb joke thing [laughs].<\/span><\/p>\nJohn:<\/strong> There used to be a \u201cComplete Book of the Bonsai Part 3,\u201d but Anna was like enough of that, so we\u2019re going to change the name of that. I think I might just call something \u201cThe Complete Book Part 4,\u201d but leave the bonsai out!<\/span><\/p>\nAnna:<\/strong> Naming instrumental pieces is so hard. Whenever I write a composition, I\u2019m like, \u201cJohn, can you listen to this and help me come up with a title?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nJohn:<\/strong> She never uses my suggestions! She\u2019s just weeding out the bad ones!<\/span><\/p>\nAnna:<\/strong> I used one, but then I took it from this one piece and gave it to another one [laughs]! But whenever we\u2019re doing a show and I\u2019m like, \u201cThis one is called whatever,\u201d it feels weird to say that this instrumental song has this title…<\/span><\/p>\nJohn:<\/strong> In all seriousness, you start to understand \u201cUntitled #7.\u201d Anna and I are both fans of what people like to call minimalism, and that naming gambit is something easy to make fun of: \u201cMusic for 18 Musicians,\u201d \u201cMusic for Changing Parts.\u201d They say \u201cNothing changes in Philip Glass\u2019 music, haha, why\u2019d he call it that?\u201d Jokes aside, I really like those names. It\u2019s kinda like\u2026<\/span><\/p>\nAnna:<\/strong> It\u2019s just about the music, and you can come up with your own story for it.<\/span><\/p>\n